[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190907.181129.1814581845232128155.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2019 18:11:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
davejwatson@...com, borisp@...lanox.com, aviadye@...lanox.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net/tls: small TX offload optimizations
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 22:29:56 -0700
> Hi!
>
> This set brings small TLS TX device optimizations. The biggest
> gain comes from fixing a misuse of non temporal copy instructions.
> On a synthetic workload modelled after customer's RFC application
> I see 3-5% percent gain.
Series applied.
But if history is any indication I'd watch for how much this actually
helps or hurts universally. We once tried to use non-temporal stores
for sendmsg/recvmsg copies and had to turn that off because it only
helped in certain situations on certain cpus and hurt in others.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists