[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:30:20 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jgg@...lanox.com, aarcange@...hat.com, jglisse@...hat.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost: re-introducing metadata acceleration through
kernel virtual address
On 2019/9/9 上午10:18, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> On a elder CPU Sandy Bridge without SMAP support. TX PPS doesn't see
>>> any difference.
>> Why is not Kaby Lake with SMAP off the same as Sandy Bridge?
>
>
> I don't know, I guess it was because the atomic is l
Sorry, I meant atomic costs less for Kaby Lake.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists