lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:46:20 -0400
From:   Pooja Trivedi <poojatrivedi@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 0/1] net/tls(TLS_SW): double free in tls_tx_records

TLS module crash while running SSL record encryption using
klts_send_[file] using crypto accelerator (Nitrox).

Following are the preconditions and steps to reproduce the issue:

Preconditions:
1) Installed 5.3-rc4
2) Nitrox5 card plugin (crypto accelerator)

Steps to reproduce the issue:
1) Installed n5pf.ko (drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox)
2) Installed tls.ko if not is installed by default (net/tls)
3) Obtained uperf tool from GitHub
   3.1) Modified uperf to use tls module by using setsocket.
   3.2) Modified uperf tool to support sendfile with SSL.

Test:
1) Ran uperf with 4 threads
2) Each thread sends data using sendfile over SSL protocol.

After a few seconds into the test, kernel crashes because of record
list corruption

[  270.888952] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  270.890450] list_del corruption, ffff91cc3753a800->prev is
LIST_POISON2 (dead000000000122)
[  270.891194] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7387 at lib/list_debug.c:50
__list_del_entry_valid+0x62/0x90
[  270.892037] Modules linked in: n5pf(OE) netconsole tls(OE) bonding
intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common sb_edac x86_pkg_temp_thermal
intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support
irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel
aesni_intel crypto_simd mei_me cryptd glue_helper ipmi_si sg mei
lpc_ich pcspkr joydev ioatdma i2c_i801 ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler
wmi ip_tables xfs libcrc32c sd_mod mgag200 drm_vram_helper ttm
drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm isci
libsas ahci scsi_transport_sas libahci crc32c_intel serio_raw igb
libata ptp pps_core dca i2c_algo_bit dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log
dm_mod [last unloaded: nitrox_drv]
[  270.896836] CPU: 1 PID: 7387 Comm: uperf Kdump: loaded Tainted: G
        OE     5.3.0-rc4 #1
[  270.897711] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-1027R-N3RF/X9DRW, BIOS
3.0c 03/24/2014
[  270.898597] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x62/0x90
[  270.899478] Code: 00 00 00 c3 48 89 fe 48 89 c2 48 c7 c7 e0 f9 ee
8d e8 b2 cf c8 ff 0f 0b 31 c0 c3 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 18 fa ee 8d e8 9e
cf c8 ff <0f> 0b 31 c0 c3 48 89 f2 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 50 fa ee 8d e8 87
cf c8
[  270.901321] RSP: 0018:ffffb6ea86eb7c20 EFLAGS: 00010282
[  270.902240] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff91cc3753c000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  270.903157] RDX: ffff91bc3f867080 RSI: ffff91bc3f857738 RDI: ffff91bc3f857738
[  270.904074] RBP: ffff91bc36020940 R08: 0000000000000560 R09: 0000000000000000
[  270.904988] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[  270.905902] R13: ffff91cc3753a800 R14: ffff91cc37cc6400 R15: ffff91cc3753a800
[  270.906809] FS:  00007f454a88d700(0000) GS:ffff91bc3f840000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[  270.907715] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  270.908606] CR2: 00007f453c00292c CR3: 000000103554e003 CR4: 00000000001606e0
[  270.909490] Call Trace:
[  270.910373]  tls_tx_records+0x138/0x1c0 [tls]
[  270.911262]  tls_sw_sendpage+0x3e0/0x420 [tls]
[  270.912154]  inet_sendpage+0x52/0x90
[  270.913045]  ? direct_splice_actor+0x40/0x40
[  270.913941]  kernel_sendpage+0x1a/0x30
[  270.914831]  sock_sendpage+0x20/0x30
[  270.915714]  pipe_to_sendpage+0x62/0x90
[  270.916592]  __splice_from_pipe+0x80/0x180
[  270.917461]  ? direct_splice_actor+0x40/0x40
[  270.918334]  splice_from_pipe+0x5d/0x90
[  270.919208]  direct_splice_actor+0x35/0x40
[  270.920086]  splice_direct_to_actor+0x103/0x230
[  270.920966]  ? generic_pipe_buf_nosteal+0x10/0x10
[  270.921850]  do_splice_direct+0x9a/0xd0
[  270.922733]  do_sendfile+0x1c9/0x3d0
[  270.923612]  __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x5c/0xc0

Observations:
1) This issue is observed after applying "Commit a42055e8d2c3: Add
support for async encryption of records for performance"
2) 5.2.2 kernel exhibits the same issue

Attached is the complete crash log.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204669

linux-crypto original post:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=156700690108854&w=2


After adding custom profiling around lock_sock/release_sock as well as
getting backtraces of the call stack at and around the time of the
crash/race-condition, it seems like using the socket lock is not the
best way to synchronize write access to tls_tx_records, especially
when the socket lock can get released under tcp memory pressure situation.

One potential way for race condition to appear:

When under tcp memory pressure, Thread 1 takes the following code path:
do_sendfile ---> ... ---> .... ---> tls_sw_sendpage --->
tls_sw_do_sendpage ---> tls_tx_records ---> tls_push_sg --->
do_tcp_sendpages ---> sk_stream_wait_memory ---> sk_wait_event

sk_wait_event releases the socket lock and sleeps waiting for memory:

#define sk_wait_event(__sk, __timeo, __condition, __wait)       \
     ({  int __rc;                       \
         release_sock(__sk);                 \
         __rc = __condition;                 \
         if (!__rc) {                        \
             *(__timeo) = wait_woken(__wait,         \
                         TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, \
                         *(__timeo));        \
         }                           \
         sched_annotate_sleep();                 \
         lock_sock(__sk);                    \
         __rc = __condition;                 \
         __rc;                           \
     })

Thread 2 code path:
tx_work_handler ---> tls_tx_records

Thread 2 is able to obtain the socket lock and go through the
transmission of the ctx->tx_list, deleting the sent ones (as in the
for loop below).

int tls_tx_records(struct sock *sk, int flags)
{
     ....
     ....
     ....
     ....
     list_for_each_entry_safe(rec, tmp, &ctx->tx_list, list) {
          if (READ_ONCE(rec->tx_ready)) {
              if (flags == -1)
                  tx_flags = rec->tx_flags;
              else
                  tx_flags = flags;

              msg_en = &rec->msg_encrypted;
              rc = tls_push_sg(sk, tls_ctx,
                       &msg_en->sg.data[msg_en->sg.curr],
                       0, tx_flags);
              if (rc)
                  goto tx_err;

              list_del(&rec->list); // **** crash location ****
              sk_msg_free(sk, &rec->msg_plaintext);
              kfree(rec);
          } else {
              break;
          }
      }
     ....
     ....
     ....
     ....
}

When Thread 1 wakes up from tls_push_sg call and attempts list_del on
previously grabbed record which was sent and deleted by Thread 2, it
causes the crash.


To fix this race, a flag or bool inside of ctx can be used to
synchronize access to tls_tx_records.

View attachment "tls_crash_log_5_3_rc4.txt" of type "text/plain" (11274 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ