netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: mv88e6xxx: add ability to set default queue priorities per port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:49:52 -0400
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@...labora.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: mv88e6xxx: add ability to set default
 queue priorities per port

Hi Robert,

On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:42:24 -0700, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> This is a vendor specific driver/property,
> marvell,default-queue-priority (which be cheapskate on words) would be
> more readable. But still, I have some more fundamental issues with the
> general approach, see my response in the cover letter.

As Florian said, the DT is unlikely to welcome vendor specific nodes for
configuration which may be generic through standard network userspace tools.


Thanks,

	Vivien