netdev - Re: Is bug 200755 in anyone's queue??

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e364d94b2d2a2342f192d6e80fec4798578a5d07.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:56:11 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     Steve Zabele <zabele@...cast.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Mark KEATON <mark.keaton@...theon.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "shum@...ndrew.org" <shum@...ndrew.org>,
        "vladimir116@...il.com" <vladimir116@...il.com>,
        "saifi.khan@...ikr.in" <saifi.khan@...ikr.in>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "on2k16nm@...il.com" <on2k16nm@...il.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Is bug 200755 in anyone's queue??

Hi all,

On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:52 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> This clearly has some loose ends and is no shorter or simpler. So
> unless anyone has comments or a different solution, I'll finish
> up the first variant.

I'm sorry for the late feedback.

I was wondering if we could use a new UDP-specific setsockopt to remove
the connected socket from the reuseport group at connect() time?

That would not have any behavioral change for existing application
leveraging the current reuseport implementation and requires possibly a
simpler implementation, but would need application changes for UDP
servers doing reuse/connect().

WDYT?

Cheers,

Paolo