lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:30:22 +0800
From:   Hangbin Liu <haliu@...hat.com>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     CKI Project <cki-project@...hat.com>,
        Linux Stable maillist <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>,
        Xiumei Mu <xmu@...hat.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Stable queue: queue-5.2

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 09:58:10AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 04:19:56PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:36:14AM -0400, CKI Project wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > We ran automated tests on a patchset that was proposed for merging into this
> > > kernel tree. The patches were applied to:
> > > 
> > >        Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
> > >             Commit: f7d5b3dc4792 - Linux 5.2.10
> > > 
> > > The results of these automated tests are provided below.
> > > 
> > >     Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
> > >              Merge: OK
> > >            Compile: OK
> > >              Tests: FAILED
> > > 
> > > All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
> > > 
> > >   https://artifacts.cki-project.org/pipelines/128519
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > One or more kernel tests failed:
> > > 
> > >   x86_64:
> > >     ❌ Networking socket: fuzz
> > 
> > Sorry, maybe the info is a little late, I just found the call traces for this
> > failure.
> 
> And this is no longer failing?

I haven't seen this issue later. But you know, this was triggered by a fuzz test,
not sure if the bad code still exists.
> 
> What is the "fuzz" test?

It's just a socket test that create all kinds of domains/types/protocols and do
some {set,get}sockopt for TCP/UDP/SCTP
https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/blob/master/networking/socket/fuzz/socket.c#L155

Xiumei Mu also forwarded me a mail. It looks Sasha has fixed something.
But I don't know the details.

----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: "Sasha Levin" <sashal@...nel.org>
> To: "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>
> Cc: "Major Hayden" <major@...x.net>, "CKI Project" <cki-project@...hat.com>, "Linux Stable maillist"
> <stable@...r.kernel.org>, "Yi Zhang" <yi.zhang@...hat.com>, "Xiumei Mu" <xmu@...hat.com>, "Hangbin Liu"
> <haliu@...hat.com>, "Ying Xu" <yinxu@...hat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 2:25:36 AM
> Subject: Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.2.11-rc1-9f63171.cki (stable)
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:05:18PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 09:35:30AM -0500, Major Hayden wrote:
> >> On 8/27/19 7:31 AM, CKI Project wrote:
> >> >   x86_64:
> >> >       Host 2:
> >> >          ❌ Networking socket: fuzz [9]
> >> >          ❌ Networking sctp-auth: sockopts test [10]
> >>
> >> It looks like there was an oops when these tests ran on 5.2.11-rc1 and the
> >> last set of patches in stable-queue:
> >
> >Can you bisect?
>
> I think I've fixed it, let's see what happens next run.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ