netdev - [patch net-next 04/15] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Don't rely on missing extack to symbolize dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190914064608.26799-5-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date:   Sat, 14 Sep 2019 08:45:57 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com, dsahern@...il.com,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, tariqt@...lanox.com,
        saeedm@...lanox.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: [patch net-next 04/15] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Don't rely on missing extack to symbolize dump

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>

Currently if info->extack is NULL, mlxsw assumes that the event came
down from dump. Originally, the dump did not propagate the return value
back to the original caller (fib_notifier_register()). However, that is
now happening. So benefit from this and push the error up if it happened.
Remove rule cases in work handlers that are now dead code.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
 .../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 22 +------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
index 6d78d2002335..43dbe25674f7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -6019,12 +6019,6 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_del(mlxsw_sp, &fib_work->fen_info);
 		fib_info_put(fib_work->fen_info.fi);
 		break;
-	case FIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:
-		/* if we get here, a rule was added that we do not support.
-		 * just do the fib_abort
-		 */
-		mlxsw_sp_router_fib_abort(mlxsw_sp);
-		break;
 	case FIB_EVENT_NH_ADD: /* fall through */
 	case FIB_EVENT_NH_DEL:
 		mlxsw_sp_nexthop4_event(mlxsw_sp, fib_work->event,
@@ -6065,12 +6059,6 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
 					 fib_work->fib6_work.nrt6);
 		mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_work_fini(&fib_work->fib6_work);
 		break;
-	case FIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:
-		/* if we get here, a rule was added that we do not support.
-		 * just do the fib_abort
-		 */
-		mlxsw_sp_router_fib_abort(mlxsw_sp);
-		break;
 	}
 	rtnl_unlock();
 	kfree(fib_work);
@@ -6112,12 +6100,6 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_fibmr_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
 					      &fib_work->ven_info);
 		dev_put(fib_work->ven_info.dev);
 		break;
-	case FIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:
-		/* if we get here, a rule was added that we do not support.
-		 * just do the fib_abort
-		 */
-		mlxsw_sp_router_fib_abort(mlxsw_sp);
-		break;
 	}
 	rtnl_unlock();
 	kfree(fib_work);
@@ -6262,9 +6244,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
 	case FIB_EVENT_RULE_DEL:
 		err = mlxsw_sp_router_fib_rule_event(event, info,
 						     router->mlxsw_sp);
-		if (!err || info->extack)
-			return notifier_from_errno(err);
-		break;
+		return notifier_from_errno(err);
 	case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD:
 	case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_REPLACE: /* fall through */
 	case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_APPEND:  /* fall through */
-- 
2.21.0