netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: b53: Add support for port_egress

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 14 Sep 2019 17:23:37 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, b.spranger@...utronix.de,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: b53: Add support for
 port_egress_floods callback

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 08:28:39PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Add support for configuring the per-port egress flooding control for
> both Unicast and Multicast traffic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> Beneditk,
> 
> Do you mind re-testing, or confirming that this patch that I sent much
> earlier does work correctly for you? Thanks!
> 
>  drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_priv.h   |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> index 7d328a5f0161..ac2ec08a652b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> @@ -342,6 +342,13 @@ static void b53_set_forwarding(struct b53_device *dev, int enable)
>  	b53_read8(dev, B53_CTRL_PAGE, B53_SWITCH_CTRL, &mgmt);
>  	mgmt |= B53_MII_DUMB_FWDG_EN;
>  	b53_write8(dev, B53_CTRL_PAGE, B53_SWITCH_CTRL, mgmt);
> +
> +	/* Look at B53_UC_FWD_EN and B53_MC_FWD_EN to decide whether
> +	 * frames should be flooed or not.

Hi Florian

s/flooed/flooded 

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew