lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQynfwJ8HWstz-HAa7AMOGRhDC7nqKwMCKpe2Fvm7kUQgkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:43:25 -0400
From:   Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To:     Thomas Higdon <tph@...com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        Dave Jones <dsj@...com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] tcp: Add TCP_INFO counter for packets received out-of-order

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 7:23 PM Thomas Higdon <tph@...com> wrote:
>
> For receive-heavy cases on the server-side, we want to track the
> connection quality for individual client IPs. This counter, similar to
> the existing system-wide TCPOFOQueue counter in /proc/net/netstat,
> tracks out-of-order packet reception. By providing this counter in
> TCP_INFO, it will allow understanding to what degree receive-heavy
> sockets are experiencing out-of-order delivery and packet drops
> indicating congestion.
>
> Please note that this is similar to the counter in NetBSD TCP_INFO, and
> has the same name.
>
> Also note that we avoid increasing the size of the tcp_sock struct by
> taking advantage of a hole.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Higdon <tph@...com>
> ---
> changes since v4:
>  - optimize placement of rcv_ooopack to avoid increasing tcp_sock struct
>    size


Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>

Thanks, Thomas, for adding this!

After this is merged, would you mind sending a patch to add support to
the "ss" command line tool to print these 2 new fields?

My favorite recent example of such a patch to ss is Eric's change:
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2.git/commit/misc/ss.c?id=5eead6270a19f00464052d4084f32182cfe027ff

thanks,
neal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ