netdev - Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Don't error out if getsockopt() fails for XDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:31:18 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf\@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "maximmi\@mellanox.com" <maximmi@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Don't error out if getsockopt() fails for XDP_OPTIONS

Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> writes:

> On 9/13/19 8:53 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
>> On 9/10/19 12:06 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> writes:
>>>> On 9/9/19 10:46 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>>> The xsk_socket__create() function fails and returns an error if it cannot
>>>>> get the XDP_OPTIONS through getsockopt(). However, support for XDP_OPTIONS
>>>>> was not added until kernel 5.3, so this means that creating XSK sockets
>>>>> always fails on older kernels.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the option is just used to set the zero-copy flag in the xsk struct,
>>>>> there really is no need to error out if the getsockopt() call fails.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c | 8 ++------
>>>>>     1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
>>>>> index 680e63066cf3..598e487d9ce8 100644
>>>>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
>>>>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c
>>>>> @@ -603,12 +603,8 @@ int xsk_socket__create(struct xsk_socket **xsk_ptr, const char *ifname,
>>>>>     
>>>>>     	optlen = sizeof(opts);
>>>>>     	err = getsockopt(xsk->fd, SOL_XDP, XDP_OPTIONS, &opts, &optlen);
>>>>> -	if (err) {
>>>>> -		err = -errno;
>>>>> -		goto out_mmap_tx;
>>>>> -	}
>>>>> -
>>>>> -	xsk->zc = opts.flags & XDP_OPTIONS_ZEROCOPY;
>>>>> +	if (!err)
>>>>> +		xsk->zc = opts.flags & XDP_OPTIONS_ZEROCOPY;
>>>>>     
>>>>>     	if (!(xsk->config.libbpf_flags & XSK_LIBBPF_FLAGS__INHIBIT_PROG_LOAD)) {
>>>>>     		err = xsk_setup_xdp_prog(xsk);
>>>>
>>>> Since 'zc' is not used by anybody, maybe all codes 'zc' related can be
>>>> removed? It can be added back back once there is an interface to use
>>>> 'zc'?
>>>
>>> Fine with me; up to the maintainers what they prefer, I guess? :)
>
> Given this is not exposed to applications at this point and we don't do anything
> useful with it, lets just remove the zc cruft until there is a proper interface
> added to libbpf. Toke, please respin with the suggested removal, thanks!

Sure, can do :)

-Toke