netdev - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: Correct the documentation of KSZ9021 skew values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:40:35 +0000
From:   James Byrne <james.byrne@...gamienergy.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: Correct the documentation of KSZ9021
 skew values

On 16/09/2019 15:14, David Miller wrote:
> From: James Byrne <james.byrne@...gamienergy.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:46:35 +0000
> 
>> The documentation of skew values for the KSZ9021 PHY was misleading
>> because the driver implementation followed the erroneous information
>> given in the original KSZ9021 datasheet before it was corrected in
>> revision 1.2 (Feb 2014). It is probably too late to correct the driver
>> now because of the many existing device trees, so instead this just
>> corrects the documentation to explain that what you actually get is not
>> what you might think when looking at the device tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Byrne <james.byrne@...gamienergy.com>
> 
> What tree should this go into?

I believe this should go into the 'net' tree, but please let me know if 
I have submitted this patch incorrectly in some way.

James