netdev - Re: [patch iproute2-next v2] devlink: add reload failed indication

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Sep 2019 17:46:13 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
        idosch@...lanox.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        tariqt@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch iproute2-next v2] devlink: add reload failed indication

On 9/17/19 12:36 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 06:46:31PM CEST, dsahern@...il.com wrote:
>> On 9/16/19 3:44 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>>
>>> Add indication about previous failed devlink reload.
>>>
>>> Example outputs:
>>>
>>> $ devlink dev
>>> netdevsim/netdevsim10: reload_failed true
>>
>> odd output to user. Why not just "reload failed"?
> 
> Well it is common to have "name value". The extra space would seem
> confusing for the reader..
> Also it is common to have "_" instead of space for the output in cases
> like this.
> 

I am not understanding your point.

"reload failed" is still a name/value pair. It is short and to the point
as to what it indicates. There is no need for the name in the uapi (ie.,
the name of the netlink attribute) to be dumped here.