lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:22:07 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>, Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:55:47AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov > <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote: > > > If we agree in principle, I would like to have the very first 3 patches > > in an immutable branch off maybe -rc8 so that it can be pulled into > > individual subsystems so that patches switching various drivers to > > fwnode_gpiod_get_index() could be applied. > > I think it seems a bit enthusiastic to have non-GPIO subsystems > pick up these changes this close to the merge window so my plan > is to merge patches 1.2.3 (1 already merged) and then you could > massage the other subsystems in v5.4-rc1. > > But if other subsystems say "hey we want do fix this in like 3 days" > then I'm game for an immutable branch as well. No, if it is still has a chance for -rc1 then I'm good. I was thinking if it does not go into -rc1 I could convince some of them merge a targeted immutable branch off -rc8 or 5.3 final and then apply patches relevant to their subsystems so we do not have to wait till 5.6 to land everything. Thanks. -- Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists