[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSdVFguDHXYPJBRrLhzPWBaykd+7PRqEmGf_eOFC3iHpAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:17:08 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, marcelo.leitner@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/5] Support fraglist GRO/GSO
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:25 AM Steffen Klassert
<steffen.klassert@...unet.com> wrote:
>
> This patchset adds support to do GRO/GSO by chaining packets
> of the same flow at the SKB frag_list pointer. This avoids
> the overhead to merge payloads into one big packet, and
> on the other end, if GSO is needed it avoids the overhead
> of splitting the big packet back to the native form.
>
> Patch 1 Enables UDP GRO by default.
>
> Patch 2 adds a netdev feature flag to enable listifyed GRO,
> this implements one of the configuration options discussed
> at netconf 2019.
>
> Patch 3 adds a netdev software feature set that defaults to off
> and assigns the new listifyed GRO feature flag to it.
>
> Patch 4 adds the core infrastructure to do fraglist GRO/GSO.
>
> Patch 5 enables UDP to use fraglist GRO/GSO if configured and no
> GRO supported socket is found.
Very nice feature, Steffen. Aside from questions around performance,
my only question is really how this relates to GSO_BY_FRAGS.
More specifically, whether we can remove that in favor of using your
new skb_segment_list. That would actually be a big first step in
simplifying skb_segment back to something manageable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists