[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEKGpzjUu7Qr0PbU6Es=7J6KAsyr9K1qZvFoWxZ-dhPsD0_8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 02:37:36 +0900
From: "Daniel T. Lee" <danieltimlee@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bpf-next,v3] samples: bpf: add max_pckt_size option at xdp_adjust_tail
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:04 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:33 PM Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, at xdp_adjust_tail_kern.c, MAX_PCKT_SIZE is limited
> > to 600. To make this size flexible, a new map 'pcktsz' is added.
> >
> > By updating new packet size to this map from the userland,
> > xdp_adjust_tail_kern.o will use this value as a new max_pckt_size.
> >
> > If no '-P <MAX_PCKT_SIZE>' option is used, the size of maximum packet
> > will be 600 as a default.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@...il.com>
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Change the helper to fetch map from 'bpf_map__next' to
> > 'bpf_object__find_map_fd_by_name'.
> >
> > samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_kern.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> > samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_user.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_kern.c b/samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_kern.c
> > index 411fdb21f8bc..d6d84ffe6a7a 100644
> > --- a/samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_kern.c
> > +++ b/samples/bpf/xdp_adjust_tail_kern.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,13 @@
> > #define ICMP_TOOBIG_SIZE 98
> > #define ICMP_TOOBIG_PAYLOAD_SIZE 92
> >
> > +struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") pcktsz = {
> > + .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY,
> > + .key_size = sizeof(__u32),
> > + .value_size = sizeof(__u32),
> > + .max_entries = 1,
> > +};
> > +
>
> Hey Daniel,
>
> This looks like an ideal use case for global variables on BPF side. I
> think it's much cleaner and will make BPF side of things simpler.
> Would you mind giving global data a spin instead of adding this map?
>
Sure thing!
But, I'm not sure there is global variables for BPF?
AFAIK, there aren't any support for global variables yet in BPF
program (_kern.c).
# when defining global variable at _kern.c
libbpf: bpf: relocation: not yet supported relo for non-static
global '<var>' variable found in insns[39].code 0x18
By the way, thanks for the review.
Thanks,
Daniel
> > struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") icmpcnt = {
> > .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY,
> > .key_size = sizeof(__u32),
> > @@ -64,7 +71,8 @@ static __always_inline void ipv4_csum(void *data_start, int data_size,
> > *csum = csum_fold_helper(*csum);
> > }
> >
>
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists