[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bc2e1658e74963d6c3ff297acdcbce6@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:04:18 -0600
From: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/5] net: Add NETIF_F_GRO_LIST feature
On 2019-09-18 10:10, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:25 AM Steffen Klassert
> <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> wrote:
>>
>> This adds a new NETIF_F_GRO_LIST feature flag. I will be used
>> to configure listfyed GRO what will be implemented with some
>> followup paches.
>
> This should probably simultaneously introduce SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST as well
> as a BUILD_BUG_ON in net_gso_ok.
>
> Please also in the commit describe the constraints of skbs that have
> this type. If I'm not mistaken, an skb with either gso_size linear
> data or one gso_sized frag, followed by a frag_list of the same. With
> the exception of the last frag_list member, whose mss may be less than
> gso_size. This will help when reasoning about all the types of skbs we
> may see at segmentation, as we recently had to do [1]
>
Would it be preferrable to allow any size skbs for the listification.
Since the original skbs are being restored, single gso_size shoudln't
be a constraint here.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists