[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43a07f33-96ec-a169-4316-1b97a4927492@ucloud.cn>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:40:04 +0800
From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
To: jiri@...nulli.us
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net/sched: cls_api: Fix nooffloaddevcnt counter
when indr block call success
sorry forget cc to jiri.
On 9/19/2019 4:37 PM, wenxu@...oud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>
> A vxlan or gretap device offload through indr block methord. If the device
> successfully bind with a real hw through indr block call, It also add
> nooffloadcnt counter. This counter will lead the rule add failed in
> fl_hw_replace_filter-->tc_setup_cb_call with skip_sw flags.
>
> In the tc_setup_cb_call will check the nooffloaddevcnt and skip_sw flags
> as following:
> if (block->nooffloaddevcnt && err_stop)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> So with this patch, if the indr block call success, it will not modify
> the nooffloaddevcnt counter.
>
> Fixes: 7f76fa36754b ("net: sched: register callbacks for indirect tc block binds")
> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
> ---
> v3: rebase to the net
>
> net/sched/cls_api.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> index 32577c2..c980127 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> @@ -607,11 +607,11 @@ static void tc_indr_block_get_and_ing_cmd(struct net_device *dev,
> tc_indr_block_ing_cmd(dev, block, cb, cb_priv, command);
> }
>
> -static void tc_indr_block_call(struct tcf_block *block,
> - struct net_device *dev,
> - struct tcf_block_ext_info *ei,
> - enum flow_block_command command,
> - struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +static int tc_indr_block_call(struct tcf_block *block,
> + struct net_device *dev,
> + struct tcf_block_ext_info *ei,
> + enum flow_block_command command,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct flow_block_offload bo = {
> .command = command,
> @@ -621,10 +621,15 @@ static void tc_indr_block_call(struct tcf_block *block,
> .block_shared = tcf_block_shared(block),
> .extack = extack,
> };
> +
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bo.cb_list);
>
> flow_indr_block_call(dev, &bo, command);
> - tcf_block_setup(block, &bo);
> +
> + if (list_empty(&bo.cb_list))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + return tcf_block_setup(block, &bo);
> }
>
> static bool tcf_block_offload_in_use(struct tcf_block *block)
> @@ -681,8 +686,6 @@ static int tcf_block_offload_bind(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
> goto no_offload_dev_inc;
> if (err)
> goto err_unlock;
> -
> - tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_BIND, extack);
> up_write(&block->cb_lock);
> return 0;
>
> @@ -691,9 +694,10 @@ static int tcf_block_offload_bind(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
> err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto err_unlock;
> }
> + err = tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_BIND, extack);
> + if (err)
> + block->nooffloaddevcnt++;
> err = 0;
> - block->nooffloaddevcnt++;
> - tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_BIND, extack);
> err_unlock:
> up_write(&block->cb_lock);
> return err;
> @@ -706,8 +710,6 @@ static void tcf_block_offload_unbind(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
> int err;
>
> down_write(&block->cb_lock);
> - tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND, NULL);
> -
> if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc)
> goto no_offload_dev_dec;
> err = tcf_block_offload_cmd(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND, NULL);
> @@ -717,7 +719,9 @@ static void tcf_block_offload_unbind(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
> return;
>
> no_offload_dev_dec:
> - WARN_ON(block->nooffloaddevcnt-- == 0);
> + err = tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND, NULL);
> + if (err)
> + WARN_ON(block->nooffloaddevcnt-- == 0);
> up_write(&block->cb_lock);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists