[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190920194533.5886-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 21:45:33 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: liuxuenetmail@...il.com, alex.aring@...il.com,
stefan@...enfreihafen.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] ieee802154: mcr20a: simplify a bit 'mcr20a_handle_rx_read_buf_complete()'
Use a 'skb_put_data()' variant instead of rewritting it.
The __skb_put_data variant is safe here. It is obvious that the skb can
not overflow. It has just been allocated a few lines above with the same
'len'.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
drivers/net/ieee802154/mcr20a.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/mcr20a.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/mcr20a.c
index 17f2300e63ee..8dc04e2590b1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/mcr20a.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/mcr20a.c
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ mcr20a_handle_rx_read_buf_complete(void *context)
if (!skb)
return;
- memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), lp->rx_buf, len);
+ __skb_put_data(skb, lp->rx_buf, len);
ieee802154_rx_irqsafe(lp->hw, skb, lp->rx_lqi[0]);
print_hex_dump_debug("mcr20a rx: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists