netdev - Re: CONFIG_NET_TC_SKB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f1983a74-d144-6d21-9b20-59cea9afc366@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Sat, 21 Sep 2019 02:06:24 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NET_TC_SKB_EXT

On 9/21/19 12:56 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
[...]
>> I thought idea of stuffing things into skb extensions are only justified if
>> it's not enabled by default for everyone. :(
>>
>>     [0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHC9VhSz1_KA1tCJtNjwK26BOkGhKGbPT7v1O82mWPduvWwd4A@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
> 
> The skb ext allocation is only done with GOTO_CHAIN, which AFAIK only
> has practical use for offload.  We could perhaps add another static
> branch there or move the OvS static branch out of the OvS module so
> there are no linking issues?
> 
> I personally have little sympathy for this piece of code, it is perhaps
> the purest form of a wobbly narrow-use construct pushed into TC for HW
> offload.
> 
> Any suggestions on the way forward? :(

Presumably there are no clean solutions here, but on the top of my head for
this use case, you'd need to /own/ the underlying datapath anyway, so couldn't
you program the OVS key->recirc_id based on skb->mark (or alternatively via
skb->tc_index) which was previously set by tc ingress?

Thanks,
Daniel