netdev - Re: [PATCH] [v2] net: stmmac: selftest: avoid large stack usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190921194946.710bb0f1@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Sat, 21 Sep 2019 19:49:46 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] net: stmmac: selftest: avoid large stack usage

On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:33:43 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Putting a struct stmmac_rss object on the stack is a bad idea,
> as it exceeds the warning limit for a stack frame on 32-bit architectures:
> 
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_selftests.c:1221:12: error: stack frame size of 1208 bytes in function '__stmmac_test_l3filt' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_selftests.c:1338:12: error: stack frame size of 1208 bytes in function '__stmmac_test_l4filt' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> 
> As the object is the trivial empty case, change the called function
> to accept a NULL pointer to mean the same thing and remove the
> large variable in the two callers.
> 
> Fixes: 4647e021193d ("net: stmmac: selftests: Add selftest for L3/L4 Filters")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Applied, thank you!