lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 07:46:11 +0000 From: Christophe ROULLIER <christophe.roullier@...com> To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> CC: "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "joabreu@...opsys.com" <joabreu@...opsys.com>, "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>, "mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>, Peppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] net: ethernet: stmmac: some fixes and optimization Hi Jakub, all, It is not urgent, no problem to wait next merge window (release 5.5) For patch 1 and 3, it is improvement/cleanup because now syscfg clock is not mandatory (I put code backward compatible). Regards, Christophe On 9/23/19 12:12 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 07:38:12 +0200, Christophe Roullier wrote: >> Some improvements (manage syscfg as optional clock, update slew rate of >> ETH_MDIO pin, Enable gating of the MAC TX clock during TX low-power mode) >> Fix warning build message when W=1 > There seems to be some new features/cleanups (or improvements as > you say) here. Could you explain the negative impact not applying > these changes will have? Patches 1 and 3 in particular. > > net-next is now closed [1], and will reopen some time after the merge > window is over. For now we are only expecting fixes for the net tree. > > Could you (a) provide stronger motivation these changes are fixes; or > (b) separate the fixes from improvements? > > Thank you! > > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists