lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:49:35 +0300
From:   Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
        Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] iwlwifi: dvm: excessive if in rs_bt_update_lq()

There is no need to check 'priv->bt_ant_couple_ok' twice in
rs_bt_update_lq(). The second check is always true. Thus, the
expression can be simplified.

Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
index 74229fcb63a9..226165db7dfd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static void rs_bt_update_lq(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rxon_context *ctx,
 		 * Is there a need to switch between
 		 * full concurrency and 3-wire?
 		 */
-		if (priv->bt_ci_compliance && priv->bt_ant_couple_ok)
+		if (priv->bt_ci_compliance)
 			full_concurrent = true;
 		else
 			full_concurrent = false;
-- 
2.21.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists