lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:17:06 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
joabreu@...opsys.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
bbiswas@...dia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] net: stmmac: Enhanced addressing mode for DWMAC
4.10
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 09:45:08PM +0200, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 19:00:34 +0200
>
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >
> > The DWMAC 4.10 supports the same enhanced addressing mode as later
> > generations. Parse this capability from the hardware feature registers
> > and set the EAME (Enhanced Addressing Mode Enable) bit when necessary.
>
> This looks like an enhancement and/or optimization rather than a bug fix.
>
> Also, you're now writing to the high 32-bits unconditionally, even when
> it will always be zero because of 32-bit addressing. That looks like
> a step backwards to me.
>
> I'm not applying this.
Sounds like you would prefer v2 of this:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=129768&state=*
While v2 didn't have a cover letter, it did write the upper 32 bits
conditionally.
Do you want to pick that up instead, or do you want me to send out a v4
with the cover letter from v3 and the patches from v2?
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists