netdev - Re: [RFC 04/20] RDMA/irdma: Add driver framework definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Sep 2019 20:02:15 +0200
From:   "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/20] RDMA/irdma: Add driver framework definitions

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:55:12PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:45:03AM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > +int i40iw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct i40e_peer_dev_platform_data *pdata =
> > +		dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > +	struct i40e_info *ldev;
> 
> I thought Greg already said not to use platform_device for this?

Yes I did, which is what I thought this whole "use MFD" was supposed to
solve.  Why is a platform device still being used here?

thanks,

greg k-h