netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it arch-independent.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f338b57-b0b2-e439-6089-72e5f5e4f017@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Sep 2019 14:06:12 +0100
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To:     Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        yangbo.lu@....com, john.stultz@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
        maz@...nel.org, richardcochran@...il.com, Mark.Rutland@....com,
        Will.Deacon@....com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Steve.Capper@....com, Kaly.Xin@....com, justin.he@....com,
        nd@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it
 arch-independent.

Hi Jianyong,

On 26/09/2019 12:42, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> Currently, ptp_kvm modules implementation is only for x86 which includs
> large part of arch-specific code.  This patch move all of those code
> into new arch related file in the same directory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@....com>
> ---
>   drivers/ptp/Makefile                 |  1 +
>   drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => kvm_ptp.c} | 77 ++++++------------------
>   drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_x86.c            | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h        | 12 ++++
>   4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>   rename drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => kvm_ptp.c} (63%)

minor nit: Could we not skip renaming the file ? Given
you are following the ptp_kvm_* for the arch specific
files and the header files, wouldn't it be good to
keep ptp_kvm.c ?

Rest looks fine.

Cheers
Suzuki