[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190927163911.11179-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:39:11 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] net: dsa: rtl8366: Check VLAN ID and not ports
There has been some confusion between the port number and
the VLAN ID in this driver. What we need to check for
validity is the VLAN ID, nothing else.
The current confusion came from assigning a few default
VLANs for default routing and we need to rewrite that
properly.
Instead of checking if the port number is a valid VLAN
ID, check the actual VLAN IDs passed in to the callback
one by one as expected.
Fixes: d8652956cf37 ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
---
drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
index ca3d17e43ed8..e2c91b75e843 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
@@ -340,9 +340,11 @@ int rtl8366_vlan_prepare(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
{
struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
int ret;
+ int i;
- if (!smi->ops->is_vlan_valid(smi, port))
- return -EINVAL;
+ for (i = vlan->vid_begin; i < vlan->vid_end; i++)
+ if (!smi->ops->is_vlan_valid(smi, port))
+ return -EINVAL;
dev_info(smi->dev, "prepare VLANs %04x..%04x\n",
vlan->vid_begin, vlan->vid_end);
@@ -369,9 +371,11 @@ void rtl8366_vlan_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
u32 untag = 0;
u16 vid;
int ret;
+ int i;
- if (!smi->ops->is_vlan_valid(smi, port))
- return;
+ for (i = vlan->vid_begin; i < vlan->vid_end; i++)
+ if (!smi->ops->is_vlan_valid(smi, port))
+ return;
dev_info(smi->dev, "add VLAN on port %d, %s, %s\n",
port,
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists