lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW6dSs__fCw4C2HZ_jA7s=2mbW2L8cLCxyAcPLFQ3hsKHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:53:16 -0700
From:   Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] selftests/bpf: undo GCC-specific
 bpf_helpers.h changes

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 1:42 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com> wrote:
>
> Having GCC provide its own bpf-helper.h is not the right approach and is
> going to be changed. Undo bpf_helpers.h change before moving
> bpf_helpers.h into libbpf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ