lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 Oct 2019 15:37:35 +0200
From:   Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@...dijck-laurijssen.be>
To:     Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] can: C_CAN: add bus recovery events

On di, 01 okt 2019 09:40:57 +0200, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> On do, 26 sep 2019 08:50:51 +0000, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> > While the state is update when the error counters increase and decrease,
> > there is no event when the bus recovers and the error counters decrease
> > again. So add that event as well.
> > 
> > Change the state going downward to be ERROR_PASSIVE -> ERROR_WARNING ->
> > ERROR_ACTIVE instead of directly to ERROR_ACTIVE again.
> 
> This looks like a proper thing to do
> Acked-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@...dijck-laurijssen.be>

Thanks for this, now I see when the bus is normal again.

Tested-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@...dijck-laurijssen.be>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists