lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 15:37:35 +0200 From: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@...dijck-laurijssen.be> To: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>, "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] can: C_CAN: add bus recovery events On di, 01 okt 2019 09:40:57 +0200, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > On do, 26 sep 2019 08:50:51 +0000, Jeroen Hofstee wrote: > > While the state is update when the error counters increase and decrease, > > there is no event when the bus recovers and the error counters decrease > > again. So add that event as well. > > > > Change the state going downward to be ERROR_PASSIVE -> ERROR_WARNING -> > > ERROR_ACTIVE instead of directly to ERROR_ACTIVE again. > > This looks like a proper thing to do > Acked-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@...dijck-laurijssen.be> Thanks for this, now I see when the bus is normal again. Tested-by: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@...dijck-laurijssen.be>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists