[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191002010356.GG3499@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 22:03:56 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: set newsk sk_socket before processing
listening sk backlog
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:10:18PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> This patch is to fix a NULL-ptr deref crash in selinux_sctp_bind_connect:
>
> [...] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
> [...] RIP: 0010:selinux_sctp_bind_connect+0x16a/0x230
> [...] Call Trace:
> [...] security_sctp_bind_connect+0x58/0x90
> [...] sctp_process_asconf+0xa52/0xfd0 [sctp]
> [...] sctp_sf_do_asconf+0x782/0x980 [sctp]
> [...] sctp_do_sm+0x139/0x520 [sctp]
> [...] sctp_assoc_bh_rcv+0x284/0x5c0 [sctp]
> [...] sctp_backlog_rcv+0x45f/0x880 [sctp]
> [...] __release_sock+0x120/0x370
> [...] release_sock+0x4f/0x180
> [...] sctp_accept+0x3f9/0x5a0 [sctp]
> [...] inet_accept+0xe7/0x6f0
>
> It was caused by that the 'newsk' sk_socket was not set before going to
> security sctp hook when doing accept() on a tcp-type socket:
>
> inet_accept()->
> sctp_accept():
> lock_sock():
> lock listening 'sk'
> do_softirq():
> sctp_rcv(): <-- [1]
> asconf chunk arrived and
> enqueued in 'sk' backlog
> sctp_sock_migrate():
> set asoc's sk to 'newsk'
> release_sock():
> sctp_backlog_rcv():
> lock 'newsk'
> sctp_process_asconf() <-- [2]
> unlock 'newsk'
> sock_graft():
> set sk_socket <-- [3]
>
> As it shows, at [1] the asconf chunk would be put into the listening 'sk'
> backlog, as accept() was holding its sock lock. Then at [2] asconf would
> get processed with 'newsk' as asoc's sk had been set to 'newsk'. However,
> 'newsk' sk_socket is not set until [3], while selinux_sctp_bind_connect()
> would deref it, then kernel crashed.
Note that sctp will migrate such incoming chunks from sk to newsk in
sctp_rcv() if they arrived after the mass-migration performed at
sctp_sock_migrate().
That said, did you explore changing inet_accept() so that
sk1->sk_prot->accept() would return sk2 still/already locked?
That would be enough to block [2] from happening as then it would be
queued on newsk backlog this time and avoid nearly duplicating
inet_accept(). (too bad for this chunk, hit 2 backlogs..)
AFAICT TCP code would be fine with such change. Didn't check other
protocols.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists