netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] libbpf: move bpf_helpers.h, bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 02 Oct 2019 09:21:41 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] libbpf: move bpf_helpers.h, bpf_endian.h into libbpf

Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> writes:

> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:10 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > +struct bpf_map_def {
>> > +     unsigned int type;
>> > +     unsigned int key_size;
>> > +     unsigned int value_size;
>> > +     unsigned int max_entries;
>> > +     unsigned int map_flags;
>> > +     unsigned int inner_map_idx;
>> > +     unsigned int numa_node;
>> > +};
>>
>> Didn't we agree on no new bpf_map_def ABI in libbpf, and that all
>> additions should be BTF-based?
>
> Oh yes, we did, sorry, this is an oversight. I really appreciate you
> pointing this out ;)
> I'll go over bpf_helpers.h carefully and will double-check if we don't
> have any other custom selftests-only stuff left there.

Great, thanks!

-Toke