[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191003100819.733be30a@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:08:19 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: "Jubran, Samih" <sameehj@...zon.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"Machulsky, Zorik" <zorik@...zon.com>,
"Matushevsky, Alexander" <matua@...zon.com>,
"Bshara, Saeed" <saeedb@...zon.com>,
"Wilson, Matt" <msw@...zon.com>,
"Liguori, Anthony" <aliguori@...zon.com>,
"Bshara, Nafea" <nafea@...zon.com>,
"Tzalik, Guy" <gtzalik@...zon.com>,
"Belgazal, Netanel" <netanel@...zon.com>,
"Saidi, Ali" <alisaidi@...zon.com>,
"Herrenschmidt, Benjamin" <benh@...zon.com>,
"Kiyanovski, Arthur" <akiyano@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 5/5] net: ena: ethtool: support set_channels
callback
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:32:33 +0000, Jubran, Samih wrote:
> > > +int ena_update_queue_count(struct ena_adapter *adapter, u32 new_channel_count) {
> > > + struct ena_com_dev *ena_dev = adapter->ena_dev;
> > > + bool dev_was_up;
> > > +
> > > + dev_was_up = test_bit(ENA_FLAG_DEV_UP, &adapter->flags);
> > > + ena_close(adapter->netdev);
> > > + adapter->num_io_queues = new_channel_count;
> > > + /* We need to destroy the rss table so that the indirection
> > > + * table will be reinitialized by ena_up()
> > > + */
Ugh, this comment is broken in the same way the comment Colin fixed in
commit 4208966f65f5 ("net: ena: clean up indentation issue") was.
Please double check your submission for this and use checkpatch.
> > > + ena_com_rss_destroy(ena_dev);
> > > + ena_init_io_rings(adapter);
> > > + return dev_was_up ? ena_open(adapter->netdev) : 0;
> >
> > You should try to prepare the resources for the new configuration before
> > you attempt the change. Otherwise if allocation of new rings fails the open
> > will leave the device in a broken state.
>
> Our ena_up() applies logarithmic backoff mechanism on the rings size if
> the allocations fail, and therefore the device will stay functional.
Sure, a heuristic like that will help, but doesn't give hard
guarantees, which is what engineers like :)
> > This is not always enforced upstream, but you can see mlx5 or nfp for
> > examples of drivers which do this right..
> >
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void ena_tx_csum(struct ena_com_tx_ctx *ena_tx_ctx, struct
> > > sk_buff *skb)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists