lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 5 Oct 2019 04:51:16 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Marek Majkowski <marek@...udflare.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] bpf: Support injecting chain calls into
 BPF programs on load

Hi "Toke,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Toke-H-iland-J-rgensen/bpf-Support-injecting-chain-calls-into-BPF-programs-on-load/20191005-035650
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
config: i386-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-13) 7.4.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/bpf/core.c: In function '__bpf_prog_free':
>> kernel/bpf/core.c:266:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'bpf_map_area_free'; did you mean 'bpf_prog_free'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
       bpf_map_area_free(array);
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       bpf_prog_free
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +266 kernel/bpf/core.c

   253	
   254	void __bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)
   255	{
   256		if (fp->aux) {
   257			free_percpu(fp->aux->stats);
   258			if (fp->aux->chain_progs) {
   259				struct bpf_array *array = fp->aux->chain_progs;
   260				int i;
   261	
   262				for (i = 0; i < BPF_NUM_CHAIN_SLOTS; i++)
   263					if (array->ptrs[i])
   264						bpf_prog_put(array->ptrs[i]);
   265	
 > 266				bpf_map_area_free(array);
   267			}
   268			kfree(fp->aux);
   269		}
   270		vfree(fp);
   271	}
   272	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (28158 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ