lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:47:01 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzbot <syzbot+618aacd49e8c8b8486bd@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] net_sched: add max len check for TCA_KIND

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:23:40 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 3:54 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:45:25 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:  
> > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 07:24:34PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> > > > Applied, queued for 4.14+, thanks!  
> > >
> > > Ahm, this breaks some user applications.
> > >
> > > I'm getting "Attribute failed policy validation" extack error while
> > > adding ingress qdisc on an app using libmnl, because it just doesn't
> > > pack the null byte there if it uses mnl_attr_put_str():
> > > https://git.netfilter.org/libmnl/tree/src/attr.c#n481
> > > Unless it uses mnl_attr_put_strz() instead.
> > >
> > > Though not sure who's to blame here, as one could argue that the
> > > app should have been using the latter in the first place, but well..
> > > it worked and produced the right results.
> > >
> > > Ditto for 199ce850ce11 ("net_sched: add policy validation for action
> > > attributes") on TCA_ACT_KIND.  
> >
> > Thanks for the report Marcelo! This netlink validation stuff is always
> > super risky I figured better find out if something breaks sooner than
> > later, hence the backport.
> >
> > So if I'm understanding this would be the fix?  
> 
> Of course not, you just break KMSAN again. Please read the original
> report.

The fix for the regression. I'm establishing the rest of 199ce850ce11
("net_sched: add policy validation for action attributes") is fine.

I mentioned this brings back the problem KMSAN reported in the part of
the email you cut off. str*cpy is the obvious answer for reimplementing
that fix.

> I will send a patch

Please do.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ