[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04420039-1877-c35d-83ce-b7365c1e6b65@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 08:12:37 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Yamin Friedman <yaminf@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 2/3] RDMA/rw: Support threshold for
registration vs scattering to local pages
On 10/7/19 6:59 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> index 4f671378dbfc..60fd98a9b7e8 100644
> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> @@ -445,6 +445,8 @@ struct ib_device_attr {
> struct ib_tm_caps tm_caps;
> struct ib_cq_caps cq_caps;
> u64 max_dm_size;
> + /* Max entries for sgl for optimized performance per READ */
^^^^^^^^^
optimal?
Should it be mentioned that zero means that the HCA has not set this
parameter?
> + u32 max_sgl_rd;
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists