[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191007155803.GA5855@unreal>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 18:58:03 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Yamin Friedman <yaminf@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 2/3] RDMA/rw: Support threshold for
registration vs scattering to local pages
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 08:12:37AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/7/19 6:59 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> > index 4f671378dbfc..60fd98a9b7e8 100644
> > --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> > +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> > @@ -445,6 +445,8 @@ struct ib_device_attr {
> > struct ib_tm_caps tm_caps;
> > struct ib_cq_caps cq_caps;
> > u64 max_dm_size;
> > + /* Max entries for sgl for optimized performance per READ */
> ^^^^^^^^^
> optimal?
>
> Should it be mentioned that zero means that the HCA has not set this
> parameter?
It is always the case for other max_* values.
>
> > + u32 max_sgl_rd;
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists