netdev - [PATCH net 5/6] rxrpc: rxrpc_peer needs to hold a ref on the rxrpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <157044337266.32635.16355496559521893007.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:16:12 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 5/6] rxrpc: rxrpc_peer needs to hold a ref on the
 rxrpc_local record

The rxrpc_peer record needs to hold a reference on the rxrpc_local record
it points as the peer is used as a base to access information in the
rxrpc_local record.

This can cause problems in __rxrpc_put_peer(), where we need the network
namespace pointer, and in rxrpc_send_keepalive(), where we need to access
the UDP socket, leading to symptoms like:

    BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __rxrpc_put_peer net/rxrpc/peer_object.c:411
    [inline]
    BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rxrpc_put_peer+0x685/0x6a0
    net/rxrpc/peer_object.c:435
    Read of size 8 at addr ffff888097ec0058 by task syz-executor823/24216

Fix this by taking a ref on the local record for the peer record.

Fixes: ace45bec6d77 ("rxrpc: Fix firewall route keepalive")
Fixes: 2baec2c3f854 ("rxrpc: Support network namespacing")
Reported-by: syzbot+b9be979c55f2bea8ed30@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---

 net/rxrpc/peer_object.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
index b700b7ecaa3d..64830d8c1fdb 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_alloc_peer(struct rxrpc_local *local, gfp_t gfp)
 	peer = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rxrpc_peer), gfp);
 	if (peer) {
 		atomic_set(&peer->usage, 1);
-		peer->local = local;
+		peer->local = rxrpc_get_local(local);
 		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&peer->error_targets);
 		peer->service_conns = RB_ROOT;
 		seqlock_init(&peer->service_conn_lock);
@@ -307,7 +307,6 @@ void rxrpc_new_incoming_peer(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct rxrpc_local *local,
 	unsigned long hash_key;
 
 	hash_key = rxrpc_peer_hash_key(local, &peer->srx);
-	peer->local = local;
 	rxrpc_init_peer(rx, peer, hash_key);
 
 	spin_lock(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
@@ -417,6 +416,7 @@ static void __rxrpc_put_peer(struct rxrpc_peer *peer)
 	list_del_init(&peer->keepalive_link);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
 
+	rxrpc_put_local(peer->local);
 	kfree_rcu(peer, rcu);
 }
 
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ void rxrpc_put_peer_locked(struct rxrpc_peer *peer)
 	if (n == 0) {
 		hash_del_rcu(&peer->hash_link);
 		list_del_init(&peer->keepalive_link);
+		rxrpc_put_local(peer->local);
 		kfree_rcu(peer, rcu);
 	}
 }