[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191008073958.GA10009@krava>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:39:58 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Julia Kartseva <hex@...com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
"labbott@...hat.com" <labbott@...hat.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org" <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"md@...ux.it" <md@...ux.it>
Subject: Re: libbpf distro packaging
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:25:51AM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> On 9/30/19, 4:13 AM, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > heya,
> > FYI we got it through.. there's libbpf-0.0.3 available on fedora 30/31/32
> > I'll update to 0.0.5 version as soon as there's the v0.0.5 tag available
> >
> > jirka
>
> Hi Jiri,
>
> I wonder what are the steps to make libbpf available for CentOS {7|8} as well?
> One (likely the quickest) way to do that is to publish it to Fedora's EPEL [1].
>
> I have a little concern about dependencies, namely elfutils-libelf-devel and
> elfutils-devel are sourced directly by CentOS repos, e.g. [2], not sure if
> dependencies from another repo are fine.
>
> Thoughts? Thanks!
I think that should be ok, I'll ask around and let you know
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists