[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1910080921350.25653@eddie.linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 09:29:58 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] netdevsim: fix spelling mistake "forbidded" ->
"forbid"
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Colin King wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> index a3d7d39f231a..ff6ced5487b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
> @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static int nsim_dev_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink, bool netns_change,
> /* For testing purposes, user set debugfs dont_allow_reload
> * value to true. So forbid it.
> */
> - NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "User forbidded reload for testing purposes");
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "User forbid the reload for testing purposes");
If nitpicking about grammar, then FWIW I believe it should actually be:
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "User forbade the reload for testing purposes");
(and then:
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "User set up the reload to fail for testing purposes");
elsewhere).
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists