[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191009115433.GG5747@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:54:33 +0100
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/13] vsock: add 'struct vsock_sock *' param to
vsock_core_get_transport()
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:26:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> -const struct vsock_transport *vsock_core_get_transport(void)
> +const struct vsock_transport *vsock_core_get_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> {
> /* vsock_register_mutex not taken since only the transport uses this
> * function and only while registered.
> */
> - return transport_single;
This comment is about protecting transport_single. It no longer applies
when using vsk->transport. Please drop it.
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists