[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pnj66a4q.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 17:22:13 -0700
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] net: taprio: Fix returning EINVAL when configuring without flags
Hi,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> writes:
> Hi Vinicius,
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 02:19, Vinicius Costa Gomes
> <vinicius.gomes@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> When configuring a taprio instance if "flags" is not specified (or
>> it's zero), taprio currently replies with an "Invalid argument" error.
>>
>> So, set the return value to zero after we are done with all the
>> checks.
>>
>> Fixes: 9c66d1564676 ("taprio: Add support for hardware offloading")
>> Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
>> ---
>
> You mean clockid, not flags, right?
I do mean "flags", yeah. The case I was testing was something like this:
$ tc qdisc replace dev $IFACE parent root handle 100 taprio \
num_tc 3 \
map 2 2 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 \
queues 1@0 1@1 2@2 \
base-time $BASE_TIME \
sched-entry S 01 300000 \
sched-entry S 02 300000 \
sched-entry S 04 400000 \
clockid CLOCK_TAI
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists