netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] genetlink: do not parse attributes for families with zero maxattr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:39:58 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] genetlink: do not parse attributes for families
 with zero maxattr

Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:44:32PM CEST, mkubecek@...e.cz wrote:
>Commit c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing
>to a separate function") moved attribute buffer allocation and attribute
>parsing from genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() into a separate function
>genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() which, unlike the previous code, calls
>__nlmsg_parse() even if family->maxattr is 0 (i.e. the family does its own
>parsing). The parser error is ignored and does not propagate out of
>genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse() but an error message ("Unknown attribute
>type") is set in extack and if further processing generates no error or
>warning, it stays there and is interpreted as a warning by userspace.
>
>Dumpit requests are not affected as genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit() bypasses
>the call of genl_family_rcv_msg_doit() if family->maxattr is zero. Do the
>same also in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit().

This is the original code before the changes:

        if (ops->doit == NULL)
                return -EOPNOTSUPP;

        if (family->maxattr && family->parallel_ops) {
                attrbuf = kmalloc_array(family->maxattr + 1,
                                        sizeof(struct nlattr *),
                                        GFP_KERNEL);
                if (attrbuf == NULL)
                        return -ENOMEM;
        } else
                attrbuf = family->attrbuf;

        if (attrbuf) {
                enum netlink_validation validate = NL_VALIDATE_STRICT;

                if (ops->validate & GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT)
                        validate = NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL;

                err = __nlmsg_parse(nlh, hdrlen, attrbuf, family->maxattr,
                                    family->policy, validate, extack);
                if (err < 0)
                        goto out;
        }

Looks like the __nlmsg_parse() is called no matter if maxattr if 0 or
not. It is only considered for allocation of attrbuf. This is in-sync
with the current code.

For dumpit, the check was there:

                        if (family->maxattr) {
                                unsigned int validate = NL_VALIDATE_STRICT;

                                if (ops->validate &
                                    GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_DUMP_STRICT)
                                        validate = NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL;
                                rc = __nla_validate(nlmsg_attrdata(nlh, hdrlen),
                                                    nlmsg_attrlen(nlh, hdrlen),
                                                    family->maxattr,
                                                    family->policy,
                                                    validate, extack);
                                if (rc)
                                        return rc;
                        }



>
>Fixes: c10e6cf85e7d ("net: genetlink: push attrbuf allocation and parsing to a separate function")
>Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
>---
> net/netlink/genetlink.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/netlink/genetlink.c b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
>index ecc2bd3e73e4..c4bf8830eedf 100644
>--- a/net/netlink/genetlink.c
>+++ b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
>@@ -639,21 +639,23 @@ static int genl_family_rcv_msg_doit(const struct genl_family *family,
> 				    const struct genl_ops *ops,
> 				    int hdrlen, struct net *net)
> {
>-	struct nlattr **attrbuf;
>+	struct nlattr **attrbuf = NULL;
> 	struct genl_info info;
> 	int err;
> 
> 	if (!ops->doit)
> 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
>+	if (!family->maxattr)
>+		goto no_attrs;
> 	attrbuf = genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse(family, nlh, extack,
> 						  ops, hdrlen,
> 						  GENL_DONT_VALIDATE_STRICT,
>-						  family->maxattr &&
> 						  family->parallel_ops);
> 	if (IS_ERR(attrbuf))
> 		return PTR_ERR(attrbuf);
> 
>+no_attrs:
> 	info.snd_seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
> 	info.snd_portid = NETLINK_CB(skb).portid;
> 	info.nlhdr = nlh;
>-- 
>2.23.0
>