netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] i40e: Add UDP segmentation offload support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bb71ee9658e7fcacde2c1bcdc258524e75474b7b.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:56:56 -0700
From:   Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
        Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:     willemb@...gle.com, aaron.f.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] i40e: Add UDP segmentation offload support

On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 10:39 -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> 
> On 10/11/2019 9:53 AM, Josh Hunt wrote:
> > Based on a series from Alexander Duyck this change adds UDP segmentation
> > offload support to the i40e driver.
> > 
> > CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> > CC: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c |  1 +
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 12 +++++++++---
> >   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > index 6031223eafab..56f8c52cbba1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c
> > @@ -12911,6 +12911,7 @@ static int i40e_config_netdev(struct i40e_vsi *vsi)
> >   			  NETIF_F_GSO_IPXIP6		|
> >   			  NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL	|
> >   			  NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM	|
> > +			  NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4		|
> >   			  NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC		|
> >   			  NETIF_F_RXHASH		|
> >   			  NETIF_F_RXCSUM		|
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> > index e3f29dc8b290..b8496037ef7f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> > @@ -2960,10 +2960,16 @@ static int i40e_tso(struct i40e_tx_buffer *first, u8 *hdr_len,
> >   
> >   	/* remove payload length from inner checksum */
> >   	paylen = skb->len - l4_offset;
> > -	csum_replace_by_diff(&l4.tcp->check, (__force __wsum)htonl(paylen));
> >   
> > -	/* compute length of segmentation header */
> > -	*hdr_len = (l4.tcp->doff * 4) + l4_offset;
> > +	if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4) {
> > +		csum_replace_by_diff(&l4.udp->check, (__force __wsum)htonl(paylen));
> > +		/* compute length of segmentation header */
> > +		*hdr_len = sizeof(*l4.udp) + l4_offset;
> > +	} else {
> > +		csum_replace_by_diff(&l4.tcp->check, (__force __wsum)htonl(paylen));
> > +		/* compute length of segmentation header */
> > +		*hdr_len = (l4.tcp->doff * 4) + l4_offset;
> > +	}
> 
> Is it guaranteed that gso_type can be either UDP or TCP only if we reach 
> here? Don't we need to handle the case where it is neither and return 
> from this function?

We should only reach here if a supported gso_type value is in the packet,
otherwise we should end up with software segmentation taking care of it
and clearing the gso_size value if I recall correctly.

Otherwise the code should have been checking for non-TCP types ages ago,
and we would have experienced all sorts of bugs.

- Alex