netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: phy: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:42:42 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: phy: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index

Hi David,

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 04:13:53PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> This series switches phy drivers form using fwnode_get_named_gpiod() and
> gpiod_get_from_of_node() that are scheduled to be removed in favor
> of fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that behaves more like standard
> gpiod_get_index() and will potentially handle secondary software
> nodes in cases we need to augment platform firmware.
> 
> This depends on the new code that can be bound in
> ib-fwnode-gpiod-get-index immutable branch of Linus' Walleij tree:
> 
>         git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git ib-fwnode-gpiod-get-index
> 
> I hope that it would be possible to pull in this immutable branch and
> not wait until after 5.5 merge window.

I see that the patches are marked as "Not applicable" in the netdev
patchwork. Does this mean that you decided against pulling this
immutable branch, or you dropped them because of kbuild complaints (that
happened because it could not figure out how to apply the patches)?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry