netdev - Re: [PATCH ghak90 V7 17/21] audit: add support for loginuid/sessionid set/get by netlink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRtZc0R6Lo9Ea4pz+h8XtOD5LE2wKuCpnQHeb8aTBerWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:40:47 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc:     containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        sgrubb@...hat.com, omosnace@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
        simo@...hat.com, Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        nhorman@...driver.com, Dan Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>,
        mpatel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak90 V7 17/21] audit: add support for loginuid/sessionid
 set/get by netlink

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:27 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> Add the ability to get and set the login uid and to get the session id
> using an audit netlink message using message types AUDIT_GET_LOGINUID
> 1024, AUDIT_SET_LOGINUID 1025 and AUDIT_GET_SESSIONID 1026 in addition
> to using the proc filesystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/audit.h |  3 +++
>  kernel/audit.c             | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+)

This is completely independent of the audit container ID work, yes?
If so, it shouldn't be part of this patchset.

--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com