netdev - Re: [net-next v3 3/7] mv88e6xxx: reject unsupported external timestamp flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191012232719.GA7148@localhost>
Date:   Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:27:19 -0700
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Intel Wired LAN <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        Brandon Streiff <brandon.streiff@...com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v3 3/7] mv88e6xxx: reject unsupported external
 timestamp flags

On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 07:36:31PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> Right, so in practice, unless it supports both edges, it should reject setting both RISING and FALLING together.

Enforcing that now *could* break existing user space, but I wonder
whether any programs would actually be affected.

Maybe we can add a STRICT flag than requests strict checking.  If user
space uses the "2" ioctl, then we would add this flag before invoking
the driver callback.

Thanks,
Richard