netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: phy: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:32:01 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: phy: switch to using fwnode_gpiod_get_index

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:05:40PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:42:42 -0700
> 
> > I see that the patches are marked as "Not applicable" in the netdev
> > patchwork. Does this mean that you decided against pulling this
> > immutable branch, or you dropped them because of kbuild complaints (that
> > happened because it could not figure out how to apply the patches)?
> 
> I can't, because the dependencies don't exist in my tree.
> 
> So submit this into the tree that will have the dependencies.

Argh, Gmail decided to stuff your original ACK and this reply in spam so
I completely missed it and just fished them out of my spam folder, sorry
about that.

OK, I'll add your ACKs and forward to Linus Walleij then. I should have
had him on the original emails...

Thanks!

-- 
Dmitry