lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:09:25 +0200
From:   Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To:     Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Enable VMBus protocol
 versions 4.1, 5.1 and 5.2

> > @@ -182,15 +182,21 @@ static inline u32 hv_get_avail_to_write_percent(
> >   * 2 . 4  (Windows 8)
> >   * 3 . 0  (Windows 8 R2)
> >   * 4 . 0  (Windows 10)
> > + * 4 . 1  (Windows 10 RS3)
> >   * 5 . 0  (Newer Windows 10)
> > + * 5 . 1  (Windows 10 RS4)
> > + * 5 . 2  (Windows Server 2019, RS5)
> >   */
> > 
> >  #define VERSION_WS2008  ((0 << 16) | (13))
> >  #define VERSION_WIN7    ((1 << 16) | (1))
> >  #define VERSION_WIN8    ((2 << 16) | (4))
> >  #define VERSION_WIN8_1    ((3 << 16) | (0))
> > -#define VERSION_WIN10	((4 << 16) | (0))
> > +#define VERSION_WIN10_V4 ((4 << 16) | (0))
> 
> I would recommend not changing the symbol name for version 4.0.
> The change makes it more consistent with the later VERSION_WIN10_*
> symbols, but it doesn't fundamentally add any clarity and I'm not sure
> it's worth the churn in the other files that have to be touched. It's a
> judgment call, and that's just my input.

My fingers were itching:  ;-) I've reverted this change, following
your recommendation.

Thanks,
  Andrea

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ