netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 5/8] net: mvneta: add basic XDP support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191016083956.GB2638@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:39:56 +0200
From:   Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
        brouer@...hat.com, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org,
        matteo.croce@...hat.com, mw@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 5/8] net: mvneta: add basic XDP support

> On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:49:52 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > @@ -3983,6 +4071,46 @@ static int mvneta_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
> >  	return phylink_mii_ioctl(pp->phylink, ifr, cmd);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int mvneta_xdp_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
> > +			    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > +	struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +	struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
> > +
> > +	if (prog && dev->mtu > MVNETA_MAX_RX_BUF_SIZE) {
> > +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Jumbo frames not supported on XDP");
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (netif_running(dev))
> > +		mvneta_stop(dev);
> > +
> > +	old_prog = xchg(&pp->xdp_prog, prog);
> > +	if (old_prog)
> > +		bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
> > +
> > +	if (netif_running(dev))
> > +		mvneta_open(dev);
> 
> Ah, the stopping and starting of the interface is sad. If start fails
> the interface is left in a funky state until someone does a stop/start
> cycle. Not that you introduced that.

I will add a return check from mvneta_open here. Thx.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mvneta_xdp(struct net_device *dev, struct netdev_bpf *xdp)
> > +{
> > +	struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +
> > +	switch (xdp->command) {
> > +	case XDP_SETUP_PROG:
> > +		return mvneta_xdp_setup(dev, xdp->prog, xdp->extack);
> > +	case XDP_QUERY_PROG:
> > +		xdp->prog_id = pp->xdp_prog ? pp->xdp_prog->aux->id : 0;
> > +		return 0;
> > +	default:
> > +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(xdp->extack, "unknown XDP command");
> 
> Please drop this message here, there are commands you legitimately
> don't care about, just return -EINVAL, no need to risk leaking a
> meaningless warning to the user space.
> 
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +}

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)