netdev - Re: [RFC 1/2] vhost: IFC VF hardware operation layer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2d711b6b-3bdc-afaa-8110-beebd6c5a896@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:45:49 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>, mst@...hat.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, dan.daly@...el.com,
        cunming.liang@...el.com, tiwei.bie@...el.com, jason.zeng@...el.com,
        zhiyuan.lv@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] vhost: IFC VF hardware operation layer


On 2019/10/16 上午9:30, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> + */
> +#define IFCVF_TRANSPORT_F_START 28
> +#define IFCVF_TRANSPORT_F_END   34
> +
> +#define IFC_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \
> +		((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC)			| \
> +		 (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT)			| \
> +		 (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)			| \
> +		 (1ULL << VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)			| \


Let's avoid using VHOST_F_LOG_ALL, using the get_mdev_features() instead.


> +		 (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE)		| \
> +		 (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ)			| \
> +		 (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS)			| \
> +		 (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) /* not fully supported */


Why not having VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM and VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM?

Thanks