netdev - [PATCH net-next v4 08/10] net: openvswitch: fix possible memleak on destroy flow-table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1571135440-24313-9-git-send-email-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:30:38 +0800
From:   xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com
To:     gvrose8192@...il.com, pshelar@....org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
        Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 08/10] net: openvswitch: fix possible memleak on destroy flow-table

From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>

When we destroy the flow tables which may contain the flow_mask,
so release the flow mask struct.

Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Tested-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>
---
 net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index 5df5182..d5d768e 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -295,6 +295,18 @@ static void table_instance_destroy(struct table_instance *ti,
 	}
 }
 
+static void tbl_mask_array_destroy(struct flow_table *tbl)
+{
+	struct mask_array *ma = ovsl_dereference(tbl->mask_array);
+	int i;
+
+	/* Free the flow-mask and kfree_rcu the NULL is allowed. */
+	for (i = 0; i < ma->max; i++)
+		kfree_rcu(rcu_dereference_raw(ma->masks[i]), rcu);
+
+	kfree_rcu(rcu_dereference_raw(tbl->mask_array), rcu);
+}
+
 /* No need for locking this function is called from RCU callback or
  * error path.
  */
@@ -304,7 +316,7 @@ void ovs_flow_tbl_destroy(struct flow_table *table)
 	struct table_instance *ufid_ti = rcu_dereference_raw(table->ufid_ti);
 
 	free_percpu(table->mask_cache);
-	kfree_rcu(rcu_dereference_raw(table->mask_array), rcu);
+	tbl_mask_array_destroy(table);
 	table_instance_destroy(ti, ufid_ti, false);
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1